A safety institute advised against releasing an early version of Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 AI model

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "A safety institute advised against releasing an early version of Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 AI model" has 667 words across 22 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 6 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "A safety institute advised against releasing an early version of Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 AI model" was covered 12 hours ago by TechCrunch, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'TechCrunch' news outlet?

TechCrunch is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 22 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28913519</li><li>URL: https://mannishnesses.beamstart.com/news/a-safety-institute-advised-against-17479391202259</li></ul>

TechCrunch 12h ago

A safety institute advised against releasing an early version of Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 AI model - TechCrunch

Quick Summary:

A third-party research institute that Anthropic partnered with to test one of its new flagship AI models, Claude Opus 4, recommended against deploying an early version of the model due to its tendency to “scheme” and deceive.

More unusually, Opus 4 would try to “whistle-blow” if it perceived a user was engaged in some form of wrongdoing.

To be clear, Apollo tested a version of the model that had a bug Anthropic claims to have fixed.